Guide · Automation
Automating business processes: where companies start
Which business processes are worth automating first, how to spot good candidates and how a pragmatic start works, without a big project.
Automating business processes means letting software handle recurring workflows instead of people, from invoicing and receipt filing to moving data between programs. It is used wherever staff repeatedly type, click or forward the same thing today. For companies it brings faster turnaround times, fewer transfer errors and more time for tasks that genuinely need human judgement.
- Good candidates are rule-based and recurring: always the same flow, high volume, clear triggers.
- The best starting point frustrates everyone: a workflow the team finds tedious creates acceptance fast.
- Automating does not mean replacing: the software takes over the manual steps, the decision stays with the person.
- Start small, then connect: one workflow automated reliably, then the next ones attached.
Which business processes can be automated?
The best fit are regular, rule-based workflows with high volume. The more uniform a process, the easier it is to automate, because fewer special cases have to be modelled.
- Quotes and invoices: generate from templates, send and track.
- Receipt processing: read documents, assign them and transfer them into the right system.
- Onboarding and approvals: recurring steps with clear responsibilities and reminders.
- Data transfer between tools: move information automatically from system to system instead of by copy-and-paste.
The common thread: repeated manual work is the clearest sign of a candidate. It pays to tidy up the workflow first, rather than simply automating detours. How this works systematically is shown in the overview on process optimization, which sets up automation properly.
How do you spot a good automation candidate?
Not every workflow is worth automating. Four traits separate good candidates from bad ones.
| Good candidate | Rather unsuitable |
|---|---|
| always runs the same way | different every time, many exceptions |
| comes up often | happens only rarely |
| follows clear rules | constantly needs judgement |
| costs noticeable time | done in minutes |
The honest assessment matters: rare special cases seldom justify the effort, while the recurring standard case with clear rules almost always does. Often the real candidate is not a single step but a whole flow spanning several programs. How such chains are cleanly linked together is described in the article automating workflows.

We never start with the most complicated process, but with the one that comes up often and frustrates the team most. A visible first success on a tedious everyday workflow convinces more than any calculation and creates appetite for the next step.
How do you start with automation?
Getting started works best in short steps rather than a big programme, because each step delivers value on its own and keeps the risk small.
- Choose a candidate. A workflow that comes up often, follows clear rules and costs noticeable time.
- Capture the rules. When does the workflow start, which steps belong to it, where is an approval needed?
- Build small. Automate exactly this workflow, in use early rather than planned for months.
- Connect and expand. Once the first case runs reliably, the next workflows attach.
Before you automate, it is worth taking a critical look at the workflow itself. Often individual steps can be removed. The cheapest step is the one that is no longer needed at all.
What does the first use case cost, and what does it deliver?
A clearly defined first use case can often be implemented in the low four figures, frequently between around 1,500 and 5,000 EUR, depending on the number of systems involved and special cases. That is not a fixed price but an order of magnitude, and it shows: the start does not have to be a big project.
The value becomes tangible when you weigh the effort against the time saved across a full year. A workflow that costs only two hours of manual work per week ties up around a hundred working hours a year. Once that step is gone, the build has often paid for itself within a few months, and the workflow keeps saving from then on. Whether a specific step pays off is covered in the article When is automation worth it?.
Where individual steps need an understanding of content, such as reading receipts or emails, pure rule-based automation ends and AI automation takes over the understanding of unstructured content. The wider frame is set out in the guide on digitising and automating processes, and for how we implement workflows in practice, see our page on process automation.
Frequently asked questions
Which business processes should you automate first?
How do I spot a good automation candidate?
Does automation replace employees?
How big does the first step need to be?
What does it cost to automate a business process?
More articles
Automation
RPA explained: what fits small and mid-sized businesses
What RPA (robotic process automation) is, where it makes sense and where a tailored automation is the better choice for small and mid-sized businesses. Honestly assessed.
Automation
Automating bookkeeping: receipts, invoices, workflows
How to automate bookkeeping in a company: reading receipts, creating and assigning invoices, handing data to the tax advisor. Explained in practical terms.
Automation
Email automation in the company: sensible examples
How email automation genuinely relieves the load in a company: sorting incoming mail, preparing replies, triggering cases. With examples and how to get started.
